Loading profile…
Loading profile…
Book
Antonio R. Damasio · 1994
Damasio's title is an accusation: Descartes was wrong to split the thinking thing from the feeling body. From patients who lost emotion and with it the ability to decide well, Damasio built the case that feeling is not the opponent of reason but one of its instruments — the body tagging options with value before deliberation begins.
Sequence ladder
Narrative Intelligence sources live outside the figurative image sequence ladder. Adaptive placement applies to image sequences, not this reading library.
What this book knows
Emotion is not reason's enemy but its biological scaffold; damage the feeling body and rational decision-making collapses.
mind-and-cognition
systems in the human brain dedicated more to reasoning…social convention and ethical rules could be lost as a result of brain damage, even when neither basic intellect nor language was affected
DEER-RC-022Elliot could no longer select that path…he would drift from a given task and spend hours sidetracked…unable to choose effectively
DEER-RC-051embodiment
the recording needle careens across the paper…a diagram of the 'body loop' and of the 'as if' loop…the brain represented by the top black perimeter and the body by the bottom
DEER-RC-125a feeling about a particular object is based on the subjectivity of the perception of the object, the perception of the body state it engenders
DEER-RC-118self-and-identity
education and acculturation add socially permissible decision-making strategies that enhance survival and serve as the basis for constructing a person
DEER-RC-103lack of understanding of the nature of feelings and reason…is cause for alarm…the idea of the human organism outlined in this book
DEER-RC-189Illuminates
Editor’s framing
This is the origin of the somatic-marker hypothesis and the ground of Vela's attention to the body in emotion and in writing — the felt sense that arrives before the reasoned account and shapes it. It sits on the body-first side of the field's central divide, in tension with the constructionist account. Read it for the inversion of a four-hundred-year-old picture: that a person stripped of feeling does not become more rational, but less able to live.
Featured passage
Receiving a comprehensive set of signals about the body state in the appropriate brain regions is the necessary beginning but is not sufficient for feelings to be felt. As I suggested in the discussion on images, a further condition for the experience is a correlation of the ongoing representation of the body with the neural representations constituting the self. A feeling about a particular object is based on the subjectivity of the perception of the object, the perception of the body state it engenders, and the perception of modified style and efficiency of the thought process as all of the above happens. Fooling the Brain What evidence is there supporting the claim that body states cause feelings? Some evidence comes from neuropsychological studies correlating loss of feeling with damage to the brain regions necessary to represent body states (see chapter 5 ), but studies conducted in normal individuals are also telling in this respect as well, specifically those by Paul Ekman. 14 When he gave normal experimental subjects instructions on how to move their facial muscles, in effect “composing” a specific emotional expression on the subjects’ faces without their knowing his purpose, the result was that the subjects experienced a feeling appropriate to the expression. For instance, a roughly and incompletely composed happy facial expression led to the subjects’ experiencing “happiness,” an angry facial expression to their experiencing “anger,” and so on. This is impressive if we consider that the subjects could perceive only sketchy, fragmentary facial postures, and that since they were neither perceiving nor evaluating any real situation that might trigger an emotion, their bodies were not exhibiting, at the outset, the visceral profile that accompanies a certain emotion. Ekman’s experiment suggests either that a fragment of the body pattern characteristic of an emotional state is enough to produce a feeling of the same signal, or that the fragment subsequently triggers the rest of the body state and that leads to the feeling. Curiously, not all parts of the brain are fooled, as it were, by a set of movements that is not produced through the usual means. New evidence from electrophysiological recordings shows that make-believe smiles generate different patterns of brain waves from those generated by real smiles. 15 At first glance the electrophysiological finding may seem to contradict that of the previously cited experiment, but it does not: although they reported the feeling appropriate to the fragment of facial expression, the subjects were well aware that they were not happy or angry at any particular thing.
Receiving a comprehensive set of signals about the body state in the appropriate brain regions is the necessary beginning but is not sufficient for feelings to be felt.
Read alongside · the magazine
Feeling as input to reason — the somatic case for writing from the body.
Read alongside · the emotions
One of the felt states Damasio reattaches to judgment rather than ruling out of it.
Scholars: Antonio Damasio
6 published passages · book excerpt · research analysis
Reader resonance signals for text sources are not wired to this view yet.